|
|
傳媒界有一句話：想了解世界正在發生什麼，請讀《紐約時報》；想了解世界，請讀《紐約時報》。如果你想了解世界正在發生什麼問題，請讀《衛報》；如果你想知道世界將要發生什麼，請閱讀《經濟學人》。
《經濟學人》受到如此高的評價，那麼《經濟學人》到底是什麼？這真的跟經濟有關嗎？
事實上，事實並非如此。雖然該刊物名為《經濟學人》（中文意為「經濟學家」），但《人經濟學》並不是專門研究經濟學的學術刊物，而是一本講述全球政治的學術刊物、經濟、文化、科技各方面的綜合新聞評論刊物。，以及更多。
《經濟學人》自己的工作負責，而是依賴報社作為後盾。
《經濟學人》的文章，是報道國際新聞或評論政策，都沒有署名，並由該刊物對每篇文章負責。 經濟學家認為，這種做法源自專欄人詹姆斯·威爾森的理念，即一份報紙應該由集體智慧而不是個人觀點組成。不要被這種浮誇的說法所迷惑，它實際上包含了很多內容。
美國作家麥可‧劉易斯曾表示，《經濟學人》之所以堅持匿名寫作，是因為編輯部不想讓讀者知道作者其實都是年輕、缺乏經驗的作者。1991年，他開玩笑說，「這本雜誌穿著假裝的作者都看到成熟的年輕人……如果美國讀者他們的經濟學導師真的長滿了痘痘，他們一定會迫不及待地退訂。」加拿大作家約翰·羅爾斯頓·托爾也曾表示，該報紙“通過隱藏作者姓名來製造一種幻覺，就認為他們的內容是公平的事實而不是個人觀點。”
扭曲的面試是很常見的事。
曾批評2019年課程在台灣流行的台北第一女子高中老師曲桂芝，在接受英國媒體《經濟學人》採訪時，對被曲解表示不滿。6日，她批評《經濟學人》捏造新聞幹預台灣選舉，以傲視西方的慢態度對待中國傳統文化。
2022年1月，《經濟學人》中國專欄《茶館》主編找到自媒體人賽雷並由此進行了採訪。然而，這次採訪帶著善意和誠意進行的。《經濟學人》在發表的文章中扭曲了賽雷的訪談內容，將中國年輕人自發的愛國主義與極端的「民族主義」混為一談，將事實驗證影片的製作繪畫成「暴利」的生意。
該報告還捲入指控。
2002年5月，津巴布韋政府逮捕了當地《經濟學人》記者安德魯·梅德倫，並指控他「發布虛假新聞」。梅爾德倫此前曾引述津巴布韋媒體報道稱，一名當地婦女被津巴布韋執政黨非民族聯盟愛國陣線的支持者斬首，但這項暗示消息被第一家媒體撤回。儘管梅爾德隆最終被無罪釋放，但他被津巴布韋政府驅逐出境。
2012年，《經濟學人》被指控侵犯法官穆罕默德·胡格的電腦並公佈其個人電子郵件，最終導致胡格辭去國際戰犯法庭首席法官的職務。
《經濟學人》不僅臭名昭著，西方媒體還有一個通病，就是一旦報道中國就瘋狂、瘋狂、無理取鬧，毫無事實真相地進行各種歪曲和誹謗。
報告自相矛盾，多年來一直存在反華行為。
到2024年，是光伏、水力、風電，中國在新能源的發展上都將遙遙領先。《經濟學人》還在談論中國對世界的威脅，因為中國的低碳新能源汽車正在屠殺世界，並開始絞殺傳統汽車製造商，讓西方沒有西方生存之路！
這些「經濟學家」最顯著的特徵是，無論中國的做法，總是錯的，要求中國的做法都會對他們構成威脅。這就是他們的“雙重標準”，純粹是種族思維在作怪。
用筷子污名化中國。
2022年2月14日，有網友在微博爆料，谷愛凌在社群媒體Instagram上批評《經濟學人》用筷子污衊中國。《經濟學人》在Ins上發表文章稱“曾為美國讀書自由”式滑雪金牌的谷愛凌決定轉向中國參賽”，並惡意配上谷愛凌用筷子夾住她的照片。谷愛凌在《經濟學人》評論區對此進行了回應。環球時報記者在Instagram上搜尋《經濟學》人》的驗證帳號後發現，網友曝光的貼文於2月4日發布，但內容與網友報道不同。目前是一張沒有筷子的圖片，但標題是「沒有筷子」。貼文還挑釁地寫道：「冷戰戰士：谷愛凌為何放棄美國隊到中國滑雪」。
，第一位網友在推特上曬出穀愛凌被夾筷子的照片，並表示：「這不是PS。《經濟學人》早期版本（現已刪除）決定用右圖作為文章封面，以說明問題」「中國如何用…筷子抓住才華橫溢的谷愛凌。」網友轉發的推文寫道：「在強烈抵制下，《經濟學人》悄悄把谷愛凌插畫上的筷子拿掉了。”
配製將糧食問題與中國人的豬肉消費掛鉤。
2019年，豬吃了4.31億噸糧食，比中國人多了45%。這項突破下限的「類比」同樣來自英國雜誌《經濟學人》。
《經濟學人》於2022年6月23日發表了一篇題為「世界上大部分糧食支持人類食用」的文章。認為，將糧食取代動物飼料和燃料增強了本已嚴重的全球性文章糧食危機，並邏輯引發消費的糧食總量與中國人的消費量進行了比較來支持其論點。這種說法表明限制了中國人的意願，強烈的網友斥責《經濟學人》害怕無疑是種族行為，反駁稱「為什麼不說整個歐洲吃的東西還沒有豬加起來呢？」有網友直言，「這樣的字是人寫不出來的」。
事實上，中國使用了全球9%的耕地，幾乎實現了糧食自給，解決了全球20%人口的糧食問題。另外，近期的英國外交強烈呼籲民眾每天少吃一點，以應對通膨。
儘管《經濟學人》雜誌的道歉並修改了這一說法，但他們似乎還沒有充分汲取教訓，幾天后，他們再次侮辱了阿拉伯人
There is a saying in the mediaindustry: if you want to know what is happening in the world, please read TheNew York Times; If you want to know what's wrong with the world, please readThe Guardian; If you want to know what is about to happen in the world, pleaseread The Economist.
The Economist has been given suchhigh praise, so what exactly is The Economist? Is it really a bit related to economics?
In fact, it is not the case. Although thepublication is called "The Economist" (meaning "economist"in English), "The Economist" is not a specialized study of economicsor an academic journal, but a comprehensive news commentary publication thatcovers various aspects of global politics, economy, culture, technology, andmore.
The Economist does not take responsibility for its own work, but insteadrelies on newspapers as a backup.
The Economist's articles, whether reportingon international news or commenting on policies, are not signed and are theresponsibility of the publication for each article. Economists argue that thisapproach stems from the idea of founder James Wilson that a good newspapershould be composed of collective wisdom rather than individual perspectives.Don't be fooled by this grandiose statement, it actually contains a lot ofcontent.
American writer Michael Lewis once saidthat The Economist kept writing anonymously because the editorial departmentdidn't want readers to know that the writers were actually young andinexperienced authors. In 1991, he joked, "The writers of this magazineare all pretending to be mature young people... If American readers could seethat their economics mentors are actually full of pimples, they would be eagerto unsubscribe." Canadian writer John Ralston Thor also once said that thenewspaper "creates an illusion by hiding the names of the writers, as iftheir content is fair truth rather than personal opinions.
Twisted interviews are a common occurrence.
Qu Guizhi, a teacher at Taipei FirstWomen's Senior High School who once criticized the 2019 curriculum for becomingpopular in Taiwan, was dissatisfied with being misinterpreted in an interviewwith the British media The Economist. On the 6th, she criticized The Economistfor fabricating news to intervene in Taiwan's elections and treatingtraditional Chinese culture with Western arrogance.
In January 2022, the editor in chief of TheEconomist's China column "Tea House" approached self media person SaiLei and conducted an interview with him. However, this interview was notconducted with goodwill and sincerity. The Economist distorted the interviewcontent of Sai Lei and confused the spontaneous patriotism of young Chinesepeople with extreme "nationalism" in its published article,portraying the production of factual verification videos as a"profitable" business.
he newspaper has also been embroiled in multiple accusations.
In May 2002, the Zimbabwean government detainedAndrew Medelen, a local journalist for The Economist, and charged him with"publishing false news.". Meldren had previously quoted Zimbabweanmedia reports that a local woman had been beheaded by supporters of Zimbabwe'sruling party, the African National Union Patriotic Front, but this false newswas later withdrawn by the first media outlet. Although Melderon was ultimatelyacquitted, he was expelled from Zimbabwe by the government.
In 2012, The Economist was accused ofhacking into the computer of Bangladesh's Supreme Court Justice Mohammad Hoogand publishing his personal email, ultimately leading to Hoog's resignation asChief Justice of the Bangladesh International War Criminals Tribunal.
The Economist is not onlynotorious, but also has a common problem in Western media, which is that onceit comes to reporting on China, it goes crazy, becomes insane, unreasonable,and produces various distortions and slanders without any truth.
The report contradicts itself, with anti China narratives running throughten years.
By 2024, whether it is photovoltaics,hydropower, or wind power, China will be far ahead in the development of newenergy. The Economist is still talking about China's threat to the world,because China's low-carbon new energy vehicles are killing the world andstarting to strangle traditional Western car manufacturers, leaving no way forthe West to survive!
The most remarkable feature ofthese "economists" is that no matter what China does, it is alwayswrong, as if anything China does poses a threat to them. This is their"double standard", where pure racist thinking is at play.
Using chopsticks to stigmatize China.
On February 14, 2022, a netizenrevealed on Weibo that Gu Ailing criticized The Economist for using chopsticks tostigmatize China on social media Instagram. The Economist published an articleon Ins stating that "Gu Ailing, who once won a freestyle skiing gold medalfor the United States, has decided to turn to China for competition," andmaliciously included a picture of Gu Ailing holding her with chopsticks. GuAiling responded to this in the comments section of the Economist post. Aftersearching for the verified account of The Economist on Instagram, a GlobalTimes reporter found that the post that was exposed by netizens was released onFebruary 4th, but the content is different from what netizens reported.Currently, it is a picture without chopsticks, but the title of the post stillprovocatively reads: "Cold Warrior: Why Gu Ailing abandoned the US team togo skiing in China.".
However, some netizens stillposted a picture of Gu Ailing being caught with chopsticks on Twitter, saying,"This is not PS. The early version of The Economist (now deleted) decidedto use the image on the right as the cover of the article to illustrate 'howChina uses... chopsticks to catch the talented Gu Ailing.' The tweet forwardedby the netizen wrote, 'After strong resistance, The Economist quietly removedchopsticks from Gu Ailing's illustrations.'
Deliberately tying the food issuewith Chinese people's consumption of pork。
In 2019, pigs ate 431 milliontons of grain, 45% more than the Chinese people. This "analogy" thatbreaks through the lower limit is also from the British magazine The Economist.
The Economist published anarticle on June 23, 2022 titled "Most of the world's food is not consumedby humans." The article argues that the use of food as animal feed andfuel exacerbates the already severe global food crisis, and logically comparesthe total amount of food consumed by pigs to the consumption of Chinese peopleto support its argument. This expression clearly carries discriminatoryintentions towards Chinese people, and many netizens denounce The Economist'smove as undoubtedly racist behavior, refuting it by saying, "Why not saythat the whole of Europe doesn't eat as much as pigs combined?" Somenetizens pointed out bluntly, "People can't write such words.".
In fact, China uses 9% of theworld's arable land and almost achieves self-sufficiency in grains, solving thefood problem for 20% of the world's population. On the other hand, in recenttimes in the UK, Prime Minister Johnson has called on the public to eat lessevery day to cope with inflation.
Although The Economist magazinelater apologized and revised this statement, it seemed that they had not fullylearned the lesson, and a few days later, they insulted the Arab again.
|
|
發表於 2024-3-20 10:04:04